Washington Evening Journal

Fairfield Ledger   Mt. Pleasant News
Neighbors Growing Together | Nov 22, 2017

Brock charged with open records violation

By Linda Wenger | Jun 04, 2014

The Iowa Public Information Board (IPIB) charged Washington County Attorney Larry Brock with a violation of Iowa Code Section 22.2, according to official IPIB documents, May 30. He has been charged with Failure to Provide Open Records. A contested case hearing will be held before the IPIB on July 10, 2014, at 12 p.m., at the Wallace Building in Des Moines.
The charge stems from a request for documents from Bob Bellmer, who was dismissed from his job as park ranger on Jan. 27, 2014, by the Washington County Conservation Board. The IPIB document of May 30 states that Brock advised the board during the board meeting.
Bellmer submitted a request to Brock for copies of all correspondence, including electronic mail, between members of the conservation board and Brock from Nov. 1, 2013, to March 1, 2014. The IPIB document states that the request for the correspondence was pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 22, and that the correspondence was never provided.
The IPIB document includes a timeline. The timeline states that Bellmer wrote a letter to Brock seeking the correspondence on March 3, 2014, and that Brock received the letter on March 3, 2014. On March 20, Bellmer sent an e-mail to Brock asking for the correspondence again. Brock did not respond.
Bellmer filed a complaint to the IPIB on April 5. Margaret Johnson, the IPIB deputy director, e-mailed Brock on April 15, 2014, notifying Brock of the complaint filed against him. Brock did not respond to her e-mail.
Brock did send an e-mail to Johnson on April 18, stating that he was out of the office preparing for a trial the next week. Brock was concerned the documents requested by Bellmer were privileged. Later in that day, Johnson noted that six weeks had passed since Bellmer made the request.
Johnson e-mailed Brock on April 23, 2014, about his concerns about privilege, along with a copy of a court opinion, but Brock did not respond.
On May 15, the IPIB accepted Bellmer’s complaint. Johnson e-mailed Brock to notify him that the complaint was approved. The e-mail gave Brock until May 27, 2014, to seek an informal resolution. Brock did not reply.
According to the timeline, if Brock is found in violation of Iowa Code Section 22.2, he may owe statutory damages of up to $500, and reasonable attorney fees. If he is found to have knowingly violated Iowa Code Section 22.2, Brock could owe statutory damages up to $2,500 and reasonable attorney fees.
According to the IPIB Notice of Hearing, Brock is required to respond to the petition he was served with within 20 days of the date he received the petition, including filing an answer to the charges.

Comments (0)
If you wish to comment, please login.